Post image for I Wish We Had Google Understand Not Google Instant Search

Earlier this week Google launched the latest iteration of the SERP’s, Google Instant. While I, like everyone else, had fun playing and finding some of the holes in it, it’s really not a product that I think will succeed. To Google’s credit, I can’t ever say that I’ve heard people complain that Google takes too long to serve them results. What I do hear and personally experience is that I wish Google understood what I was looking for …

Google didn’t learn that all this complexity isn’t what people want from the failed Google wave and Sidewiki experiments …

 I understand why Google launched a product like Google instant search: they feel that, because they are smart enough at predicting what you are looking for, they can interpret your query after a word or two–or sometimes after just a few letters. They think they know you so well that they can guess what you want without being told. Without getting too involved in what’s going on behind the scenes, Google is using previous search volume to predict the most likely term(s) you are looking for. It’s a sophisticated leap forward in technology to be sure, but it’s not something that solves a problem I hear people complain about. (As a side, this does give a lot more context to the bizarre statement Eric Schmidt made a few weeks ago: “They want Google to tell them what they should be doing next.”)

The problem that I have is getting Google to understand what I meant by that query. I work with search engines all day, so I like to think I have some expertise and can form queries that will get me the right result after one or two tries–or at least help me figure out what I should be searching for. Recently I was searching for a way to import an accountant’s file into Quickbooks on a Mac, so I started with [import accountants file quickbooks mac]. It turned up all sorts of lovely sales pages for the Mac version of Quickbooks. A few tries later I found that the combination I needed was [quickbooks mac accountant’s copy]. Now, if Google was able to figure out my intent and serve up the results for the second query and save 15-20 minutes of digging around, that would be a great product, but serving me the wrong information faster via an ajax interface doesn’t solve my problem and doesn’t help me as a user. Oh–and for the record, at the time of this post’s writing, you can’t create or import an accountant’s file in Quickbooks for a Mac.

by using search volume as a predictive indicator, Google is almost always going to be showing the highest dollar advertising …

Not to sound like a conspiracy theorist nutjob, but what we’ve really got going on are the two wrong problems being solved. Google engineers and developers are smart people, and they want to do cool stuff and need to feel challenged (see users vs developers) . However, they move at pace much faster than most of the world and think that, if the rest of the world would just catch up with them, everything would be better. So we’ll just opt everyone in to this new advance we made. No need to thank us. Google opting everyone in without asking is pretty much standard operating procedure. It’s how they have decided to drag everyone into the future.  Secondly, by using search volume as a predictive indicator, Google is almost always going to be showing the highest dollar advertising first. I get it, NO ONE at Google will ever say that profitability has anything to do with user experience. Eric Schmidt says some bat shit crazy things on a predictably regular basis, but even he won’t say that out loud. They will all just realize it without it needing to be said.

Personally, I don’t think it’s useful. In fact, I think it’s distracting, like your annoying, nerdy, know-it-all nephew who answers your questions before you finish speaking. However, Google didn’t learn that all this complexity isn’t what people want from the failed Google wave and Sidewiki experiments. I can tell you that if I wasn’t an SEO, this would push me over to Bing … I suspect I’m not alone …

This post originally came from Michael Gray who is an SEO Consultant. Be sure not to miss the Thesis WordPress Theme review.

I Wish We Had Google Understand Not Google Instant Search

tla starter kit

Related posts:

  1. How TED Helped Me Understand Personalized Search Long time readers here will know that I’m not a…
  2. Why You Should Be Worried About Google Search Wiki I’ve been beating the drum about why personaized search and…
  3. Google Personalized Search – Don’t Become a Google Traffic Addict Recently I was doing a bit of research on personalized…
  4. Google Search Tricks, Tips and Hints Even though I work in the search engine space I…
  5. How to Turn Off Personalized Search in Google Chrome With the impending arrival of Google OS I’ve been spending…

Advertisers:

  1. Text Link Ads – New customers can get 0 in free text links.
  2. CrazyEgg.com – Supplement your analytics with action information from click tracking heat maps.
  3. BOTW.org – Get a premier listing in the internet’s oldest directory.
  4. Ezilon.com Regional Directory – Check to see if your website is listed!
  5. Page1Hosting – Class C IP Hosting starting at .99.
  6. Directory Journal – List your website in our growing web directory today.
  7. Content Customs – Unique and high quality SEO writing services, providing webmasters with hundreds of SEO articles per week
  8. Majestic SEO – Competitive back link intellegence for SEO Analysis
  9. Glass Whiteboards – For a professional durable white board with no ghosting, streaking or marker stains, see my Glass Whiteboard Review
  10. Need an SEO Audit for your website, look at my SEO Consulting Services
  11. KnowEm – Protect your brand, product or company name with a continually growing list of social media sites.
  12. Scribe SEO Review find out how to better optimize your wordpress posts.
  13. TigerTech – Great Web Hosting service at a great price.

Michael Gray – Graywolf’s SEO Blog

0 Comments to "I Wish We Had Google Understand Not Google Instant Search"

Would you like to share your thoughts?